We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website Learn more

Jun 2, 2018

Euroanaesthesia 2018

09 / Comparative effects of variable ventilation and a stepwise recruitment maneuver on atelectasis and hemodynamics in an experimental model of ARDS.

;

ventilation

mechanics

airway

elastance

mechanical ventilation

Abstract

Abstract

thumbnail

Keywords

ventilation

mechanics

airway

elastance

mechanical ventilation

Abstract

Background and Goal of Study:Variable volume controlled ventilation (VV) has the potential to reverse atelectasis. We hypothesized that VV is superior to a conventional stepwise recruitment maneuver (RM) to open atelectatic lung tissue. Materials and Methods:In total, 9 pigs were anesthetized and ventilated in airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) mode with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and driving pressure of 15 cmH2O, as well as respiratory rate (RR)=20/min. Four saline lung lavages were performed and lungs recruited in APRV by stepwise increase of PEEP to 45 cmH2O (10 cmH2O increments, RR=20/min, driving pressure=15 cmH2O) (stepwise RM). Then, a decremental PEEP trial was conducted in volume-controlled ventilation with VT=6 mL/kg and RR=30/min to determine the PEEP that resulted in the highest compliance (optimal PEEP). Animals were submitted to two recruitment strategies (random sequence): 1) stepwise RM followed by 30 min of volume-controlled ventilation with VT=6 mL/kg, RR=30/min and optimal PEEP; and 2) VV, consisting of 30 min volume-controlled ventilation with random variation of VT (mean=6mL/kg, normal distribution, coefficient of variation of 30%), RR=30/min and optimal PEEP. Before recruitment strategies, animals were disconnected from the ventilator for 30 seconds and volume-controlled mechanical ventilation resumed during 5 minutes with constant VT=6 mL/kg, RR=30/min and optimal PEEP to reset lung history. I:E ratio and FIO2 were kept constant at 1:1 and 1.0, respectively. Before and after each recruitment strategy, lung aeration was assessed by computed tomography, and the center of aeration along the ventral-dorsal gradient was determined. Results and Discussion:Both recruitment strategies increased the amount of normally aerated tissue and decreased the amount of poorly and non-aerated lung tissue (Table 1). The reduction of non-aerated lung tissue was greater after VV than stepwise RM. The stepwise RM, but not VV, resulted in significant reduction of mean arterial pressure (76 [71...84] to 42 [38...43] mmHg, P<0.001) and increase of heart rate (111 [80...111] to 121 [106…131] bpm, P=0.004, median [1st …3rd quartile]). Conclusion(s):In this model of ARDS, VV more effectively reduced non-aerated lung tissue, with less effects on hemodynamics as compared to a stepwise RM.

Discover over 20,000 new abstracts, posters and presentations from leading academic conferences every month. Stay on top of the latest findings, methodologies and discussions happening in your research field around the world.

Company

Legal

Follow us

© Copyright 2019 Morressier GmbH. All rights reserved.

© Copyright 2019 Morressier GmbH.
All rights reserved.