We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website Learn more

Sep 11, 2018

ERC congress - Resuscitation 2018

2 - Comparison of hemodynamic effect and survival rate between the newly developed automatic CPR(X-CPR) device and LUCAS in a swine model of cardiac arrest

lucas

automatic cpr device

x-cpr

cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Abstract

Abstract

thumbnail

Keywords

lucas

automatic cpr device

x-cpr

cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Abstract

Abstract Introduction We conducted a study to compare hemodynamic effect between newly developed motor-driven simultaneous sterno-thoracic cardiopulmonary resuscitation device (X-CPR 2) and Lund University cardiac arrest system (LUCAS 2). Materials and methods Twenty-five pigs were divided into two groups (n=13 in X-CPR2 group). After 2 minutes of ventricular fibrillation (VF), all received CPR with 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratio for 6 minutes. Thereafter continuous chest compression and intermittent ventilation at rate of 10 per minute were followed for 12 minutes. 2 J/kg was delivered at 6 minutes after VF induction and energy was modified to 4 J/kg if cardiac rhythm was VF on defibrillator. Epinephrine 1 mg was injected every 4 minutes from 8 minutes after VF induction. Hemodynamic parameters including mean aortic pressure (MAP), right atrial pressure (RAP), coronary perfusion pressure (CPP), carotid blood flow (CBF) and end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure (ETCO2) were measured at baseline and every 2 minutes after VF induction. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 2 hour survival, 24 hour survival and cerebral performance category (CPC) at 24 hours were evaluated. Autopsy was performed to evaluate the device-induced mechanical complications including rib fracture, lung contusion, hemothorax, hemopericardium and hemoperitoneum. Results Hemodynamic parameters were not different between groups except RAP (p=0.002). Total epinephrine dose, defibrillation frequency, rate of ROSC, 2-hour survival rate, 24-hour survival rate and good neurologic outcome (CPC≤2) were also not different between groups. There was also no difference in mechanical complications between groups. Conclusions The hemodynamic effect was not different between X-CPR2 and LUCAS. RAP was maintained higher in X-CPR2 group.

Discover over 20,000 new abstracts, posters and presentations from leading academic conferences every month. Stay on top of the latest findings, methodologies and discussions happening in your research field around the world.

Company

Legal

Follow us

© Copyright 2019 Morressier GmbH. All rights reserved.

© Copyright 2019 Morressier GmbH.
All rights reserved.