and 2 other(s)
Purpose of the study: Rapid response teams (RRTs) have been implemented as an in-hospital cardiac arrest prevention strategy. We investigated RRT nurses’ attitudes to their work and the concept of the rapid response system. Materials and methods: We conducted a multicentre survey including all Finnish tertiary hospitals’ RRT nurses. We used a 5-point Likert-type agreement scale in our anonymous questionnaire. Results: The response rate was 46% (range 34-93% between the hospitals). The respondents’ had median three years’ experience on RRT duties. Over 90% of the respondents felt that RRT both prevents cardiac arrests and improves patient safety. Seventy-eight percent considered that their critical care skills had improved through the RRT duties; this response was more common among the nurses with five or more RRT activations per month (94% vs. 71%, p=0.002). Similarly, nurses with five or more RRT activations per month considered their work meaningful (94% vs. 76%, p=0.017) and wanted to continue as RRT nurses (91% vs. 74%, p=0.022) more often as compared with those nurses with four or less RRT activations per month. The respondents considered that ward nurses are able to detect patient deterioration (75%), but half (49%) answered that ward doctors are not capable to treat deteriorating patients. Two thirds (67%) felt that their workload was greater as compared with their non-RRT associated colleagues. Conclusions: RRT nurses feel their work important with improved critical care skills; these experiences are highlighted among the RRT nurses with more frequent RRT participation. The increased workload issues should be addressed.
No datasets are available for this submission.
No license information is available for this submission.