We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website Learn more

Sep 20, 2018

ERC congress - Resuscitation 2018

7 - OPIS (OPinion of Instructor Suitability): implementation of an electronic scoring system versus first-come first-served recruitment of instructors for a medium-large European resuscitation council (ERC) Basic Life Support (BLS) course in the UK

;

electronic

instructor

bls

training

Abstract

Abstract

thumbnail

Keywords

electronic

instructor

bls

training

Abstract

Introduction Many life support courses use informal, subjective methods of instructor recruitment. (1) We hypothesised that assessment of instructor candidate suitability based on predetermined, agreed criteria that are applied electronically may select an overall more effective instructor cohort than can be achieved through a first-come-first-served recruitment system. Materials and methods This observational prospective study was conducted between October 2016 and April 2018 by the University of Birmingham’s Resuscitation for Medical Disciplines (RMD) group, who deliver an annual European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Basic Life Support programme. (2) A novel system for instructor recruitment was devised, named OPIS (Opinion of Instructor Suitability). Course students were invited to apply to become future instructors. Existing instructors scored each potential new instructor electronically based on a set of novel criteria. Overall scores were calculated, and offers to become instructors made to applicants with the highest scores. Student examination performance, feedback from students and mid-course student CPR quality (assessed by Laerdal Resusci Anne® SkillReporter) were recorded and analysed for differences following introduction of OPIS. Results There were no observable differences in the feedback provided by candidates on the performance of their teachers. Overall first sit pass rate was reduced significantly from 78.91% to 74.63% (p=0.049) . Following introduction of OPIS-selected instructors, candidates were less likely to fail because of chest compression rate, AED use, and recovery position protocol. However, they were at a significantly greater chance of failing due to errors in CPR algorithm recall, and chest compression depth. CPR rate (p=0.039) and correct release of compressions (p<0.01) were significantly improved in the group with OPIS selected teachers. Conclusion Implementation of OPIS for instructor selection did not substantially alter BLS examination pass rates. There is an objective improvement across the board in results from quantitative CPR performance. Further work is planned to assess its utility. References 1. FAQs for instructors and instructor potentials. Resuscitation Council UK (Online). Accessed 2018 May 25. Available from URL: https://www.resus.org.uk/information-on-courses/faqs-for-instructors/ 2. Harvey P, Higenbottam C, Owen A, Hulme J, Bion J. Peer-led training and assessment in basic life support for healthcare students: Synthesis of literature review and fifteen years practical experience. Resuscitation. 2012;83(7):894-899.

Discover over 20,000 new abstracts, posters and presentations from leading academic conferences every month. Stay on top of the latest findings, methodologies and discussions happening in your research field around the world.

Company

Legal

Follow us

© Copyright 2019 Morressier GmbH. All rights reserved.

© Copyright 2019 Morressier GmbH.
All rights reserved.