We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website Learn more

Home

Saved research

Submission

8 - Variation in Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Orders and Emergency Care and Treatment Plan use in English Acute Hospitals; a National Survey

Submitted

28 Views
0 Downloads
0 Saves

Presented at

ERC congress - Resuscitation 2018

-

Presentation

thumbnail

Abstract

Purpose of the study; Variation in the recording of DNACPR decisions between healthcare organisations creates policy and communication challenges when patients are transferred between organisations1,2. A recent UK study identified the need for a nationwide system to record resuscitation decisions alongside other treatment escalation decisions2. The development of the UK-based Recommended Summary for Emergency care and Treatment Plan (ReSPECT) process was a response to this need3. ReSPECT has been available to healthcare organisations to adoption since Spring 2017. The purpose of this study was to record current variation in the way in which DNACPR decisions are recorded in UK hospitals and identify the current uptake of the ReSPECT process. Materials and methods; We conducted an online survey between October 2017 and March 2018 of all UK adult NHS hospitals participating in the National Cardiac Arrest Audit (NCAA). Descriptive statistics were used to report the results. Results Of the 187 hospitals surveyed, 114 (61%) responded. Most hospitals reported using a DNACPR form (n=57, 50%). Other hospitals used either a DNACPR form with separate treatment escalation plan (n=35, 31%), an ECTP or DNACPR form combined with a treatment escalation plan (n=20, 18%), or another system (n=2, 2%). In total, 8 hospitals (7%) were using the ReSPECT system. Conclusions; There is variation in the way in which DNACPR decisions are recorded in UK hospitals. To date, only a small number of hospitals have implemented the ReSPECT process. References 1. Freeman K, et al. Variation in local trust Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) policies: a review of 48 English healthcare trusts. BMJ open 2015; 5: e006517. 2. Perkins GD, et al. Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resusitation (DNACPR) Decisions: Evidence Synthesis. Health Services and Delivery Research. NIHR Journals Library 2016; 4: 11 3. ReSPECT Process website. https://www.respectprocess.org.uk accessed 8.5.18

Datasets

No datasets are available for this submission.

License

No license information is available for this submission.

Morressier

Company

Legal

Follow us

© Copyright 2020 Morressier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Morressier

© Copyright 2020 Morressier GmbH.
All rights reserved.