We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website Learn more

Home

Saved research

Submission

Effects of osseodensification on Astra TX and EV implant systems

Submitted

86 Views
0 Downloads
1 Saves

Presented at

EAO-2018

-

Presentation

thumbnail

Abstract

Background: Success of a dental implant is largely influenced by the initial stability generated at its time of placement. Numerous studies have attempted to further identify the factors that influence primary stability. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis and objective values that can be measured and have been proven to show a direct relationship with initial stability. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine if a new drilling system based on osseodensification, had any effect on the primary stability and healing outcomes of 2 different implant systems of different macrogeometries but similar surface treatments. Materials and Methods: Two types of implants, Astra TX (Dentply Sirona) and Astra EV (Dentply Sirona), were included in this study. Six male sheep had 3 implants of each type placed into the hip bilaterally. Three different osteotomy preparations were made for each implant. One using the manufactured recommended drilling protocols, denoted regular or “R”. One using the Densah protocol (Versah, Jackson, MI, USA) with a 2.0 mm pilot, 2.8 mm, and 3.8 mm multi fluted burs in a clockwise rotation (CW), as well as in a counterclockwise rotation (CCW), or osseodensification. Insertion torque and RFA was measured at placement and sites were left to heal for 6 weeks. At 6 weeks animals were sacrificed and samples were prepared for histology. Results: Significant differences in insertion torque and RFA among the three drilling protocols were observed, with the Versah drills showing substantially higher values. No difference was observed between the two implant systems in regard to insertion torque and RFA. Minimal difference was shown between the R protocol and Versah protocol for the TX system in terms of BIC and BAFO. However, the EV system showed a large difference between the R protocol and Versah system in terms of BIC and BAFO with the Densah system being substantially higher in both categories. The EV system also had much higher BIC and BAFO in all drilling protocols compared to the TX system. Significantly more autogenous bone chip debris in direct contact with the implant surface were observed with Versah drilling protocols. Conclusions: The conclusions of this study are that the osseodensification created by the Densah drilling protocol provides a substantially higher insertion torque and RFA compared to the manufacturer recommended protocol, leading to improved clinical performance. Also, that Astra EV has superior osseointegration capability compared to the Astra TX with Densah protocols.

Datasets

No datasets are available for this submission.

License

No license information is available for this submission.

Morressier

Company

Legal

Follow us

© Copyright 2020 Morressier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Morressier

© Copyright 2020 Morressier GmbH.
All rights reserved.