We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website Learn more

Home

Saved research

Submission

Efficacy and safety of switching from basal insulin to once-daily insulin IDegAsp in Japanese patients with T2DM

Submitted

2 Views
0 Downloads
0 Saves

Presentation

thumbnail

Abstract

Background: Basal insulin-supported oral therapy (BOT) is commonly used to initiate insulin therapy when oral hypoglycemic agents do not achieve adequate glycemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes. While supplementing basal insulin is expected to reduce the fasting plasma glucose level, some patients still fail to achieve the target hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), probably due to postprandial hyperglycemia. Elevated postprandial glucose levels make an important contribution to overall hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes, suggesting that treatment targeting postprandial glucose in addition to fasting plasma glucose may be able to improve glycemic control. Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is a novel combination drug [70% insulin degludec (IDeg) and 30% insulin aspart (IAsp)]. IDeg and IAsp exist separately in solution (Eur J Endocrinol; 167: 287, 2012), allowing formulation as a single injection. After subcutaneous injection, IDeg immediately forms stable multihexamers that create a tissue depot from which IDeg monomers slowly dissociate, while IAsp monomers are rapidly released into the circulation. Based on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of IDegAsp, it may be a novel option for BOT that could improve postprandial plasma glucose (although only after one meal a day). However, IDegAsp has a 30% lower content of basal insulin, suggesting that the fasting plasma glucose level may increase after switching from basal insulin to IDegAsp on a 1: 1 unit basis. Aims: The present study was performed to develop an algorithm for safe and effective switching from basal insulin to once-daily insulin IDegAsp in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. Methods: This was a prospective, 4-week, single-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target study. Between April 2016 and March 2017, patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited at the outpatient clinic of St. Marianna University Hospital (Kawasaki, Japan). Patients were randomly assigned to continue their current basal insulin therapy (n=10) or to switch to IDegAsp on a 1: 1 unit basis (n=10). The insulin dose was titrated weekly at hospital visits or via telephone. Based on the mean self-measured blood glucose (SMBG) level before breakfast during the preceding 7 days, the dose was increased by 2 units if SMBG was > 100 mg/dL or was reduced by 2 units if it was < 80 mg/dL. At baseline and after 4 weeks, a mixed meal test (total caloric content of 460 kcal, including 53% carbohydrate, 16% protein, and 31% fat) was performed to evaluate the plasma glucose profile (fasting and 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, and 120 min postprandially). Results: There were no differences between the two groups with regard to gender, age, duration of diabetes, body mass index, fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, blood pressure, and serum lipid profile. After 4 weeks, the SMBG before breakfast was significantly decreased from baseline by 29 ± 8 mg/dL in the basal insulin group (P=0.007), and was decreased by 18 ± 9 mg/dL in the IDegAsp group (P=0.328). In both groups, the mean daily dose of insulin was significantly increased by 60%. In the meal test, the mean plasma glucose level showed a significant decrease of 22 ± 6 mg/dL in the basal insulin group (P=0.008 vs. baseline) and 49 ± 7 mg/dL in the IDegAsp group (P < 0.001 vs. baseline). The mean estimated treatment difference (IDegAsp group – basal insulin group) was –27.5 mg/dL (95% CI –47, –8, p=0.008). After 4 weeks, the AUC0-2h of glucose was 20,300 ± 4,500 mg·min/dL in the basal insulin group (P = 0.004 vs. baseline) and 18,000 ± 4,100 mg·min/dL in the IDegAsp group (P < 0.001 vs. baseline). The mean estimated treatment difference (IDegAsp group – basal insulin group) was –2,800 mg·min/dL (95% CI –5,300, –350, p=0.028), confirming that IDegAsp was superior to basal insulin. In the IDegAsp group, the 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose level was significantly decreased from 204 ± 36 mg/dL to 133 ± 40 mg/dL (p<0.001), which was in the fasting plasma glucose range. There were no confirmed hypoglycemic episodes in either group during the 4-week study period. Discussion: When switching from basal insulin, the IDegAsp dose can be up-titrated by 60% based on fasting plasma glucose data. However, postprandial glucose monitoring should be considered to minimize the risk of postprandial hypoglycemia when up-titrating the IDegAsp dose beyond 60%. (registration number: UMIN000021629)

Datasets

No datasets are available for this submission.

License

No license information is available for this submission.

Morressier

Company

Legal

Follow us

© Copyright 2020 Morressier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Morressier

© Copyright 2020 Morressier GmbH.
All rights reserved.