We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website Learn more

Home

Saved research

Submission

Histological comparison of socket preservation with PRF or allograft- A report of three cases

Submitted

31 Views
0 Downloads
1 Saves

Presented at

EAO-2018

-

Presentation

thumbnail

Abstract

Introduction: Physiological changes after tooth extraction result in progressive bone resorption and decrease in bone height and weight. Most of the dimensional changes occur during the first 3 months after tooth extraction. There are different methods and materials used for socket preservation. Recent studies showed that PRF promotes soft tissue and bone regeneration. Case report: The first case was a 29-year-old female with a non-restorable upper first molar on the right side. The patient was treated with a socket preservation procedure with allograft. The second case was a 33-year-old female with a fractured upper right first premolar. This patient was treated with socket preservation procedure with PRF as a sole graft material. The third case was a 21-year-old female with fractured lower left second molar. The socket was left with blood clot only. All three of the sockets were closed primarily with nonresorbable sutures. A 3 mm diameter core biopsy was taken from each socket 4 months after the procedure. During the surgical reentry an implant was placed on all three cases and its primary stability was measured. Conclusions: The presented clinical case showed rapid and uncomplicated patient recovery, with very good primary implant stability. The histological findings suggest that filling a fresh extraction socket either with PRF or allograft provides a relevant solution for implant site preparation.

Datasets

No datasets are available for this submission.

License

No license information is available for this submission.

Morressier

Company

Legal

Follow us

© Copyright 2020 Morressier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Morressier

© Copyright 2020 Morressier GmbH.
All rights reserved.