We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website Learn more

Home

Saved research

Submission

PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT CAROTID STENOSIS ULTRASOUND CRITERIA IN PATIENTS WITH CONTRALATERAL CAROTID OCCLUSION. A CASE SERIES

Submitted

16 Views
0 Downloads
0 Saves

Presented at

ESOC-2019

-

Presentation

thumbnail

Abstract

Background and Aims: Several flow velocity thresholds have been proposed as diagnostic criteria for carotid stenosis >50% using color-coded duplex (CCD) in patients with contralateral occlusion, assuming that compensatory flow acceleration may overestimate the grade of stenosis. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of different criteria in our neurosonology lab. Methods: Retrospective observational study of patients attended at our neurosonology lab for CCD with confirmed contralateral carotid occlusion by angio-CT in the preceding 6 months. We compared classic criteria for carotid stenosis >50%: Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) >125cm/s, End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) > 40cm/s and Systolic Index (SI) >2 with those proposed by Preiss et al.: PSV >250 cm/s, EDV >90 cm/s and SI >2.3. We built ROC curves to determine the best cut-off points (defined by highest Sensitivity + Specificity) in our sample. Measurements in angio-CT using NASCET criteria were used as the gold standard. Results: Of 86 patients with carotid occlusion, 25 (29%) had a contralateral carotid stenosis >50%. Classic criteria showed better performance (88-84-76% Sensitivity, 85-82-87% Specificity, according to PSV-EDV-SI) than those proposed than Preiss et al (60-32-64% Sensitivity, 100-100-92% Specificity). ROC curves set the best cut-off points at PSV>114cm/s, EDV >38cm/s and SI >1.46, with 96-88-88% Sensitivity and 82-82-84% Specificity. Conclusions: Classic criteria for defining carotid stenosis by CCD showed a good performance in patients with contralateral occlusion. Use of more specific criteria may result in under detection of significant stenosis. Even lower cut-offs seem to achieve the best performance in our cohort

Datasets

No datasets are available for this submission.

License

No license information is available for this submission.

Morressier

Company

Legal

Follow us

© Copyright 2020 Morressier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Morressier

© Copyright 2020 Morressier GmbH.
All rights reserved.