Background: The www.strokengine.ca is a knowledge translation resource in stroke rehabilitation (assessments and interventions) for health professionals/students (HP), stroke survivors (SS) and their relatives. According to Google analytics, the website is perused over 8 000 times/week. With the overall aim to improve its content, we solicit feedback from the reader on information consulted with respect to its: 1) situational relevance, 2) cognitive impact, 3) intention-to-use and 4) expected patient/health benefits. We also describe who the users are.
Methods: An online survey anchored in the Information Assessment Method (IAM) was posted as an invitation tab. The IAM uses a validated questionnaire to assess the value of information. Sociodemographic characteristics are also collected and a space for comments is provided. Descriptive statistics are used. 
Results: We have preliminary data from 35 HP (including 8 students) and 5 chronic SS. Information was found to be relevant for all HP. Though all SS understood the content, 1/5 found it not relevant. HP initiated a search to get new knowledge on a topic (20/35), to confirm something they had forgotten (10/35) or were unsure of (13/35). Only 1/35 HP expected no benefits while 7/35 HP had no intention to use. The majority of SS (4/5) expected no benefits as information did not relate to their situation.
Conclusion: Content targeting SS may need improvement to increase its perceived relevance. Final data set will be presented with a focus on pros/cons of crowdsourcing as a method to evaluate stroke-related information.

CROWDSOURCING TO IMPROVE KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION OF STROKE REHABILITATION ASSESSMENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: THE EXPERIENCE OF WWW.STROKENGINE.CA