Aim: to evaluate the efficiency of «Burnshield»  bandages with hydrogel in the local treatment of burn wounds in in ambulatory patients. 
Method: we observed 11 patients (group I) from 19 to 70 years old (49.18 + 12.06; median 47.2): 7 men and 4 women with burns of II degree with a burn area from 1% to 5% TBSA (2.2 + 1.4; median 3), they received non-hospital treatment and had «Burnshield»  bandages represents a flexible  foamy polyurethane base impregnated hydrogel «Burnshield» composed of 96% water, 1.5% propylene glycol.,  1.03% Melaleuca alternofolia (tea tree oil) and 0.025% ethanol. In the other group were 10 patients, where the wounds were treated in the traditional bandages. We evaluated healing and analgesic effects for visual analogue scale (VAS).
Results / Discussion: «Burnshield» dressings were well tolerated by all patients, it was easily modeled on the wound surface, The evaporation of his contact with burn wound results in cooling of the baked surface. Sick notes the cessation of pain . In group I, еpithelialization  II degree was to 7.5 + 1.15 days (median 7.5) from the moment of injury. The «Burnshield» hydrogel, which is part of the dressing, evaporated during its contact with the burn wound and cooled the burned surface, which led to its anesthesia. Before using Burnshield, pain was assessed by VAS at 9.2 + 0.56 points (median 9). After applying the “Burnshield” bandage, the pain on 4.4 ± +1.02 points; (median 4). In group II patients, wounds of II degree were epithelized by 11 +5.6 days (median 9.05). When using traditional dressings in patients of group II, the level of pain on VAS was 8.35 + 1.15 points (median 8.2).
Conclusion: «Burnshield»  bandages is an very effective for local treatment of patients with burns in patients undergoing outpatient treatment.

6 - The possibility of using «Burnshield» bandages in patients undergoing outpatient treatment.