Policy changes, especially in the regulatory requirements for the safety of new products, are often impeded because decision makers in national regulatory bodies are unaware of the science supporting new methodologies. This is not entirely unexpected since such individuals may be more exposed to political concerns on a daily basis then scientific ones. A current example is the area of non-animal methods for toxicity testing where significant international differences in acceptance exist. Europe and the US, for example, are quickly moving to using human-derived cells and tissues rather than whole animal based models. Other countries, such as China, may be reluctant to make a change because their scientists have not had sufficient time to develop sound data bases of information. We have found that providing specific hands-on training and education on standard methods directly to regulators and scientists in these countries has significantly improved the recognition and acceptance of new approaches.

Role of education and training in supporting science-based policy development

246th National Meeting (2013)

The official archive and repository for all ACS Meetings & Expositions abstracts and select posters or presentations.