Dents or permanent deformations in a pipe result in alteration of its structural response when subjected to internal pressure. Excavation activities further lead to change in load and boundary conditions of the pipe segment which may exacerbate the stress state within the dented region. Depending on the severity of a dent, excavation under full operating pressure may lead to failure, injuries or fatalities. While current pipeline regulations require that operators must depressurize a line to ensure safe working conditions during repair activities, there are no detailed guidelines available in the codes or standards on how an operator should determine such a safe excavation pressure (SEP). As a result, the safe excavation process of dents has received attention in the industry in recent years.

A detailed review of the recent research on dent SEP showed that the current recommendations are primarily dependent on one of two aspects: careful assessment of inline inspection (ILI) data, or a fitness for purpose (FFP) assessment of the dent feature leveraging numerical models. Enbridge Liquid Pipelines Inc. had previously demonstrated a feature specific assessment approach which incorporated both ILI data and finite element analysis (FEA) to determine the SEP. This assessment also accounted for uncertainties associated with material properties and ILI tool measurement.

In the previous publication, the authors demonstrated a methodology for assessing the SEP of dents at a conceptual level from both deterministic and reliability-based standpoints. The authors also indicated that further work was required prior to implementation of this model. In this paper, a validation study has been performed to compare the results of fracture mechanics based FEA models against eleven full scale burst tests available in literature. The study showed good agreement of the burst pressure of dent-crack defects predicted by FEA models with those observed in the full scale tests. The assessment method is further streamlined by incorporating the API 579 Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) method on an uncracked FEA model as opposed to explicitly modeling the crack geometry during FEA. The results of FEA in conjunction with FAD are compared with the full scale tests to ensure accuracy and conservatism of burst pressure prediction. A reliability-based approach is then designed which accounts for the uncertainties associated with dent and pipe geometry, material properties, and crack dimensions. Three case studies are presented where the reliability-based SEP assessment method has been implemented and feature specific SEP for each case has been recommended to ensure target reliability during excavation.


Reliability-Based Assessment of Safe Excavation Pressure for Dented Pipelines

Division / Sponsors: 
Pipeline Systems Division

Paper Proceedings: https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IPC/IPC2020/volume/84447

IPC2020 - Virtual Conference

Supporting the need among researchers worldwide for additional online and multimedia content, ASME now offers the ASME Conference Video Collection. This platform will collect and provide long-term access to conference presentation videos, encompassing all technology areas within ASME's technical conference and events program. About 30,000-40,000 engineers across all mechanical engineering and related disciplines participate in ASME conferences each year. This includes authors of approximately 6,000 to 8,000 technical papers published by ASME, the majority of whom also submit video presentations for our virtual conferences. The video collection will be available as an add-on to existing product packages or as a separate subscription.