Pipeline dents have historically been regulated and assessed using dent depth as the primary metric. Many of the earliest analytical models for dent remaining life are based upon depth. Current assessment guidelines from ASME and the US Code of Federal Regulations utilize depth as a primary metric. Consequently, ILI caliper tool capabilities are stated in terms of dent depth. However, the best modern dent assessments, including both strain and fatigue assessments, are based on dent shape. At a minimum, these models require both axial and circumferential dent profiles, or the models may utilize the full three-dimensional shape of the dent. The utilization of advanced dent assessments is expected to grow in the future as the methods are incorporated into API Recommended Practices and US regulations. While operators may have confidence in the ability of an ILI tool to confidently capture dent depth, the shape of a dent is a recent consideration that is not addressed by current tool specifications. Unlike depth alone, dent shape is often a function of sensor coverage, speed, and caliper technology. Unfortunately, there is virtually no information available on the reliability of these assessment methods when they are based on ILI data. To-date, there have been no published comparisons examining the variation in strain or remaining life in identical features between multiple inspections.  The reliability of these dent assessment methods is critical when choosing safety factors or reinspection intervals. This study presents a first look at the repeatability of strain and remaining life assessments based on two separate caliper runs. The study examines dent strain according to ASME B31.8 and remaining life calculated using shape factors and finite element methods calculated for over three hundred dents. The paper examines the variation in each of the methods and provides guidance on how users should understand the results when they are based on a single inspection.


Judge Me by My Size, Do You? Or: How Reliable Are Dent Assessments Based on Ili Data?

Division / Sponsors: 
Pipeline Systems Division

Paper Proceedings: https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IPC/IPC2020/volume/84447

IPC2020 - Virtual Conference

Supporting the need among researchers worldwide for additional online and multimedia content, ASME now offers the ASME Conference Video Collection. This platform will collect and provide long-term access to conference presentation videos, encompassing all technology areas within ASME's technical conference and events program. About 30,000-40,000 engineers across all mechanical engineering and related disciplines participate in ASME conferences each year. This includes authors of approximately 6,000 to 8,000 technical papers published by ASME, the majority of whom also submit video presentations for our virtual conferences. The video collection will be available as an add-on to existing product packages or as a separate subscription.