The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the acceptance of virtual team collaboration as a replacement for face-to-face collaboration. Unlike face-to-face collaboration, virtual collaboration has different factors like technology mediation influencing communication that affects a team’s processes. However, there is a lack of rigorous research that assesses the impact of virtual teaming on the engineering design process. Therefore, the current study investigates the effect of virtual team collaboration on design outcomes by means of the MILANO (Model of Influence, Learning, and Norms in Organizations) framework. To tailor MILANO for virtual collaboration, this paper first presents an empirical study of human design teams, that shows how the model parameters for face-to-face collaboration (like self-efficacy, perceived influencers, perceived degree of influence, trust and familiarity) must be modified. The empirical study also shows the positive impact of effective communication on conflict resolution, task cohesion and the model parameters listed above. &nbsp;The MILANO was used to simulate 4 common collaboration cases (such as&nbsp;teams with an experienced agent, half of the team with high self-efficacy, all agents with the same self-efficacy and all agents with the same self-efficacy working on a complex design task) in both virtual and face-to-face settings. The results&nbsp;show how design outcomes differ with collaboration mode. For example, teams with an experienced agent perform better when collaborating face-to-face. On the contrary, the teams where half of the agents have&nbsp;high self-efficacy perform better when collaborating virtually. Collaboration mode does not produce any significant difference in design outcomes in teams where agents have similar and high self-efficacy when they begin&nbsp;working on a design task. In general, virtual team collaboration results in a lesser variety in the solutions but results in a more uniform contribution by its team agents. Overall, the study shows the effect of the individual, team and task attributes in different collaboration mode (i.e., virtual and face-to-face collaboration) on the design outcomes.&nbsp;

Comparing Virtual and Face-to-Face Team Collaboration: Insights From an Agent-Based Simulation

Paper Proceedings: https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/IDETC-CIE/IDETC-CIE2021/volume/85369

ASME 2021 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE2021)

Supporting the need among researchers worldwide for additional online and multimedia content, ASME now offers the ASME Conference Video Collection. This platform will collect and provide long-term access to conference presentation videos, encompassing all technology areas within ASME's technical conference and events program. About 30,000-40,000 engineers across all mechanical engineering and related disciplines participate in ASME conferences each year. This includes authors of approximately 6,000 to 8,000 technical papers published by ASME, the majority of whom also submit video presentations for our virtual conferences. The video collection will be available as an add-on to existing product packages or as a separate subscription.